"Mamé: Slavery, Survival, and Strategy " by Samantha Lewis Bullen

Mamé: Slavery, Survival, and Strategy

Samantha Lewis Bullen, Macaulay Honors at Lehman College

Abstract

This research paper examines the historical development of female-led and matrifocal households in Afro-American and Afro-Caribbean communities. While these family structures are often portrayed in public discourse as modern social problems, historical research suggests they developed as adaptations to slavery and colonial economic systems. This paper examines the ways in which slavery, colonial labor systems, and restrictions on interracial relationships in the Caribbean contributed to the formation of female-centered households. Using a combination of primary sources such as slave narratives and secondary historical and sociological literature, this paper analyzes how family separation, labor instability, and racial hierarchy shaped family organization. Historical research on slavery shows that mothers were often the most stable caregivers due to the forced separation of families and the control of enslaved labor. After emancipation, colonial labor systems and migration patterns continued to limit consistent paternal presence, further reinforcing female household leadership. This paper also examines how colonial racial hierarchies and informal interracial unions, due to societal expectations, contributed to patterns of single motherhood in the Caribbean. Ultimately, this paper argues that matrifocal households should be perceived not as cultural deficiencies, but as historically developed systems of resilience shaped by structural inequality. By examining these historical roots, this research contributes to a broader understanding of Black family structures and challenges deficit narratives surrounding Black motherhood and family organization.

---

Mamé: Slavery, Survival, and Strategy

The structure of the Black family in the Americas has long been a subject of discussion for historians and sociologists. In many Afro-Caribbean and Afro-American families, the mother is the head of the household and has the final say in any major decisions, regardless of whether the father is present or not. This deviation from the typical patriarchal family structure that holds the father as the head of the household is often critiqued as a shortfall of the Black community, pinning the blame on Black women for being too masculine or dominant, and Black men for being “absent” fathers (Dow 36; Meacham 25, 30). As recent studies have shown, Black men tend to be more involved in the caretaking of their children compared to other races, regardless of whether they live with the mother or live separately (Ellerbe et al. 1165). Household structures such as these are called matrifocal, describing a household structure where the mother is the primary caregiver, decision-maker, central authority figure, and often also the financial breadwinner (Smith, “The Matrifocal Family” 125).

As a descendant of slavery and a Grenadian, this structure is reflected in my own household and was also the structure followed by both the paternal and maternal side of my family for multiple generations. According to data cited by the International Fund for Agricultural Development, Grenada has the highest proportion of female-headed households in the Caribbean (25). While my household is female-led by both my maternal aunt and mother, my father is actively involved in childcare and also provides financial support, albeit not as the primary source of household income. His role is more oriented toward household chores and acting as a caregiver. As a Black man in America, my father has struggled continuously with stable employment, and he is one of the many Black men who struggle to find work, as Black men experience some of the lowest employment rates (Reeves and Pulliam). 

The household patterns described above can be understood as what sociologist Raymond T. Smith calls the matrifocal family, a structure centered around a mother and her children where fathers may be present but are not always the primary authority. Female-led and matrifocal households are not synonymous. A matrifocal household can have a man as the head of the household while a female-led household cannot. The key similarity is that both structures center on the woman and are often present simultaneously in Black families in the Americas (Smith, “The Matrifocal Family” 125). It can be argued that female-led households did not develop because families rejected fathers, but because of historical conditions that often made paternal stability difficult to maintain. This paper challenges the idea that these households are a cultural problem, arguing instead that they developed as survival strategies shaped by slavery and continued to emerge after emancipation.

Rather than viewing these family structures as shortfalls of the Black community, it is crucial to examine the historical conditions that caused this formation. This paper asks how slavery, colonial labor systems, and restrictions on interracial relationships contributed to the development of matrifocal households in Afro-American and Afro-Caribbean communities. By examining historical works, firsthand accounts of slavery, and sociological studies of Caribbean family life, this paper argues that female-led households developed not as a social issue in the Black community, but as a survival strategy arising from racial hierarchies that influenced family formation, economic instability after emancipation, and family separation under slavery. This analysis will begin by examining how slavery disrupted Black family structures, followed by how colonial labor systems reinforced female household authority, and lastly how informal interracial relationships contributed to patterns of single motherhood.

Although female-led households are often presented as a unique issue within the Black diaspora in the Americas, looking at pre-colonial West African societies shows that this structure cannot be reduced to a cultural shortcoming. While many West African societies were male-dominated and men often held formal authority within the household and in the broader community as chiefs, women still exercised significant social, economic, and political power compared to women in many European societies (Greene 16). Women participated in trade, held leadership roles, and contributed to decision-making within both the family and the wider community, demonstrating that authority was not strictly confined to men (Achebe). In addition, family life was not centered on the isolated nuclear, two-parent household, but instead relied on extended kinship networks and community-based systems of support. Child-rearing was often shared among relatives and community members, reflecting a collective approach to family life rather than an individual one (Greene 17–19). This demonstrates that the European nuclear family model was not the historical norm for many African societies, and therefore should not be treated as the standard by which Black families in the Americas are judged. However, while these structures provided a foundation for communal support and flexible gender roles, the extreme conditions of slavery would later disrupt and reshape these structures in ways that further elevated the role of Black women within the household.

The development of matrifocal households in Black American and Caribbean societies is a product of slavery. Slavery was about more than the exploitation of Black bodies for labor; it completely disrupted the family organization of Black families by separating parents and children, preventing the formation of stable households. This was a deviation from the typical European family structure that emphasized legal marriage and paternal authority (Greif 309). Maintaining this household structure was nearly impossible for enslaved families because family members could be sold away or relocated at any time. Historian Jennifer Morgan describes this reality in her essay “Reproducing Slavery,” writing that “marriage, parenthood, childhood, the interwoven relationship between family and geography—these are all destroyed or, at best, destabilized by the conventions of racial slavery” (Morgan, “Reproducing Slavery”). Fathers could become absent from enslaved family structures through separation or enslavement on different plantations, often leaving mothers as the most consistent figure in the lives of enslaved children (Morgan, Laboring Women 109).

Firsthand accounts from formerly enslaved women further demonstrate how slavery reinforced the central role of Black mothers within the family. In Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Harriet Jacobs describes the burdens placed on enslaved women, writing that “slavery is terrible for men; but it is far more terrible for women” (Jacobs 119). Jacobs explains how enslaved women were forced to complete backbreaking labor during pregnancy while also facing sexual exploitation and the constant threat of family separation (Jacobs 114–15). These conditions meant that mothers often became the emotional center of the family because they were the only consistent source of care and stability for their children. Slavery also reinforced the importance of mothers through the legal system itself. Under slavery, a child inherited their status from their mother through the legal principle known as partus sequitur ventrem (Morgan, “Partus Sequitur Ventrem” 4). This meant that even if a father was free or unknown, the child would remain enslaved if the mother was enslaved. As a result, family identity and survival often became centered around the mother rather than the father. This legal structure reinforced maternal authority within enslaved communities and contributed to the long-term development of female-centered households.

Beyond legal terms, the realities of slavery also pushed Black women into central roles within both the family and the community. As Deirdre Cooper Owens explains in Medical Bondage: Race, Gender, and the Origins of American Gynecology, enslaved women were often expected to continue field labor even during pregnancy while also serving as midwives and caregivers within enslaved communities (Owens 43). This placed Black women at the center of reproduction within enslaved communities. Their knowledge of childbirth, childcare, and healing practices allowed them to maintain authority and trust within their communities, further reinforcing their leadership roles within families. Black women also maintained family stability through informal systems of caregiving and community support, reflecting practices of collective caregiving previously discussed in pre-colonial West African societies (Morgan, Laboring Women 142; Greene 17–19). Despite the constant threat of separation, many enslaved women organized childcare networks, passed down cultural traditions, and provided emotional support that allowed families to survive under oppressive conditions (Owens 45–46). This strategy was crucial for the survival of the Black family, as at every level of life, socially, economically, and politically, the Black family faced attempts to be dismantled. 

Although slavery formally and legally ended in the nineteenth century, the labor systems that replaced it continued to shape Black family structures in a manner that reinforced female-led households. Emancipation did not automatically create economic stability for formerly enslaved men. Instead, it introduced new systems of wage labor, migration, and unemployment that made it difficult for many Black men to consistently provide for their families (Smith, “Culture and Social Structure” 27). These conditions often forced women to take on larger economic and caregiving roles within the household. Raymond T. Smith explains in “Culture and Social Structure in the Caribbean” that Caribbean family organization developed in response to economic instability rather than preference, further displaying that family structure was shaped by material conditions (Smith, “Culture and Social Structure” 26–27).

The most significant factor influencing this development was labor migration. After emancipation, many Afro-Caribbean men migrated in search of employment and greater economic stability, often resulting in periods away from their families (Clarke xli). This pattern made it difficult to maintain the traditional patriarchal household structure that depends on a consistently present male provider. Anthropologist Edith Clarke wrote in My Mother Who Fathered Me that many Caribbean households became centered around mothers because women were more likely to remain in the community while limited work opportunities caused many young men to migrate (Clarke 118, 130–31). This created a system where women became the most consistent authority figures within the household, not as the result of fathers being irrelevant, but because economic structures limited their ability to remain physically present.

Women also became central economic providers through informal labor systems. Many Caribbean women worked in markets, domestic labor, or small-scale trading economies, which allowed them to maintain a stable presence within the household while also generating income. Errol Miller describes in “The Rise of Matriarchy in the Caribbean” how women increasingly dominated education and professional opportunities while many men withdrew from formal institutions due to economic and social pressures (Miller 17). Miller further connects this shift to patterns of male deviance, a concept that describes the growing trend of male youth disengaging from education, joining gangs, and having limited access to work opportunities (Miller 17). This continued to reinforce female authority within households because women were often the most likely to have a stable source of income.

In the post-emancipation and post-industrial period, welfare policies also played a role in shaping household structure. Programs such as Aid to Dependent Children often included “man-in-the-house” policies that could remove women from welfare rolls if an adult male was present in the household, discouraging cohabitation (Quadagno 118–19). Due to these policies, some families were incentivized to maintain female-headed households in order to access financial support, which was desperately needed by many economically disadvantaged Black families. While there is insufficient evidence that this practice led to long-term paternal absence from the home, it may have reinforced the patterns of female-centered family formation discussed throughout this paper. In a limited way, this policy encouraged the normalization of female-led households in the Black community. 

These economic patterns further display that female-led Black households should not be viewed as evidence of cultural dysfunction, but as an adaptation to unstable economic conditions. When labor systems made male employment unpredictable, and welfare disincentivized the presence of men in the household, women often became the most reliable providers and decision-makers within the household. This demonstrates that matrifocal family structures developed not from the conscious rejection of fathers, but from the need for stability in environments created by economic inequality.

These economic patterns were enhanced by colonial racial hierarchies because access to opportunity was often determined by skin color (Wade 77). In the Caribbean and Latin America, the concept expressed as “lave la fanmi-a” in Antillean Creole, “mejorar la raza” in Spanish, or “Better the race” in English was a significant factor in the development of families. In this practice, dark-skinned people were encouraged to marry lighter-skinned people, partially due to social conditioning that prioritized lighter-skinned people and the racial hierarchy that offered lighter-skinned people more economic opportunities than dark-skinned people (Wade 77). Heard in many Caribbean communities is a common saying that “papa was a Scotsman” or that “papa was a sailor.” From my experience and oral accounts shared by West Indians, these phrases are often used to explain why a father is unknown or absent from the family. In these accounts, the men were often described as poor European sailors, soldiers, or indentured servants who formed temporary relationships with Black women and then left, leaving the women to raise children on their own. Relationships of this type were not always based on romance, but were often influenced by the racial hierarchy created by colonial society (Newman 149). Caribbean societies developed racial hierarchies in which mixed-race individuals, historically classified as “Mulattoes,” occupied a space on the hierarchy between Whites and Blacks, providing a sharp contrast to the United States, where mixed people of Black and White ancestry were generally classified as Black (Wade 51).

Colonial societies in the Caribbean operated under systems of color hierarchy where lighter skin was often associated with greater social mobility. As a result, some Black women entered relationships with White men as a way to improve the opportunities available to their children (Martínez-Alier 18, 41). White men had greater social freedom to enter relationships with women of color, while White women faced greater restrictions on interracial relationships, contributing to relationships between White men and Black women being more common than the reverse (Degler 189–90). This practice functioned as a form of racial and social mobility, as for the disenfranchised Black person, “lightening of skin may be more easily obtainable for one’s children than money or education” (Degler 191–92). These decisions were often survival strategies rather than personal preferences. Women were not necessarily choosing White men because they viewed them as superior, although that did play a significant role; they also understood the realities of a system where lighter-skinned children could sometimes access better economic or social opportunities (Wade 133–34).

These patterns are also reflected in my own family history. On my father's side, many of my foremothers were single mothers after relationships with White or passé blanc men who did not remain involved in the household. These decisions were not centered on the rejection of Black men, but on trying to give their children a better chance within a society shaped by racial hierarchy. This shows how female-led households were often the result of structural conditions rather than individual choices alone. Reviewing this history makes it more apparent that matrifocal households developed not as a result of Black men failing to be present fathers, but because mothers often became the most reliable source of stability.

In the present day, the historical role of Black women as primary authority figures within the household continues to shape both family dynamics and social expectations for Black women. As Errol Miller notes, women in the Caribbean have increasingly entered the workforce and higher education, continuing the trend of female economic and social prominence within the household (Miller 4–8). This pattern is also reflected more broadly, as Black women have outpaced Black men in higher education attainment, further expanding their access to professional and economic opportunities (“In Higher Education” 84). However, this shift, along with historical conditions, has also contributed to the persistence of stereotypes that portray Black women as inherently strong, self-sacrificing, and naturally suited to caregiving roles. Scholars describe this as the “Strong Black Woman” stereotype, in which Black women are expected to demonstrate resilience and emotional strength regardless of personal cost (Beauboeuf-Lafontant 32–33). These expectations are closely tied to earlier stereotypes such as the “mammy” figure, which depicted Black women as nurturing and devoted caregivers, even at the expense of their own well-being (Woodard and Mastin 271). As Dawn Marie Dow explains, Black women continue to navigate these overlapping expectations in both family and professional life, being expected to balance the pressures of being providers while also conforming to cultural ideals of strength and motherhood (Dow 39–41). While many Black women continue to embrace leadership roles within the household, others have begun to challenge these expectations and seek alternative family dynamics where they are not automatically positioned as the primary provider or emotional anchor, as seen in the rise of the “soft life” movement, which encourages Black women to prioritize rest and personal well-being (Stevens). This shows that the role of Black women in the household has extended beyond the family, continuing to shape social expectations placed on them today.

The history of matrifocal households in Afro-American and Afro-Caribbean communities shows that the structure was the result of historical necessity rather than cultural dysfunction. Slavery disrupted family stability by separating fathers and placing survival responsibilities on mothers. After emancipation, unstable labor systems and migration patterns continued to make it difficult for many Black men to maintain the traditional provider role, which further strengthened the economic and social authority of Black women. At the same time, primarily in the Caribbean, colonial racial hierarchies led to temporary relationships with White men that resulted in single motherhood. In conjunction, these factors contributed to the development of female-led households as a response to burdens placed on Black people throughout their time in the Americas. Black women did what they could to ensure the survival of their children despite the circumstances. This history challenges the ongoing narrative of “fatherless” homes in the Black community and instead highlights the agency and resilience of Black women. These historical roles continue to shape expectations placed on Black women today, as they are often assumed to be strong, self-reliant, and primary providers. Increasingly in the present day, Black women are beginning to challenge these expectations, showing that these roles are not fixed, but instead built by historical conditions. Matrifocal households are not evidence of instability in the Black community; rather, they are evidence of survival strategies that allowed the Black family to endure centuries of social and economic hardship. 

Works Cited

Achebe, Nwando. “Women and Authority in West African History.” WASSCE History Textbook, wasscehistorytextbook.com/11-women-and-authority-in-west-african-history⁠.

Beauboeuf-Lafontant, Tamara. “‘You Have to Show Strength’: An Exploration of Gender, Race, and Depression.” Gender & Society, vol. 21, no. 1, 2007, pp. 28–51. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27640945. 

Clarke, Edith. My Mother Who Fathered Me: A Study of the Families in Three Selected Communities in Jamaica. University of the West Indies Press, 1957.

Degler, Carl N. Neither Black nor White: Slavery and Race Relations in Brazil and the United States. Macmillan, 1971.

Dow, Dawn Marie. “Negotiating ‘The Welfare Queen’ and ‘The Strong Black Woman’: African American Middle-Class Mothers’ Work and Family Perspectives.” Sociological Perspectives, vol. 58, no. 1, 2015, pp. 36–55. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44014691.

 Ellerbe, Calvina Z., et al. “Race/Ethnic Differences in Nonresident Fathers’ Involvement after a Nonmarital Birth.” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 99, no. 3, 2018, pp. 1158–82. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12482.

Greene, Sandra E. “Family Concerns: Gender and Ethnicity in Pre-Colonial West Africa.” International Review of Social History, vol. 44, 1999, pp. 15–31. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26405292. 

Greif, Avner. “Family Structure, Institutions, and Growth: The Origins and Implications of Western Corporations.” American Economic Review, vol. 96, no. 2, 2006, pp. 308–12. 

Jacobs, Harriet A. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself. Edited by Lydia Maria Child, Published for the Author, 1861. Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/incidentsinlifeo1861jaco.

“In Higher Education Black Women Are Far Outpacing Black Men.” The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, no. 17, 1997, pp. 84–86. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2963239.

International Fund for Agricultural Development. Grenada Country Strategy Note. IFAD, 2017.

Martínez-Alier, Verena. Marriage, Class and Colour in Nineteenth-Century Cuba: A Study of Racial Attitudes and Sexual Values in a Slave Society. Cambridge University Press, 1974.

Meacham, Mike. “The Myth of the Black Matriarchy under Slavery.” Mid-American Review of Sociology, vol. 8, no. 2, 1983, pp. 23–41. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23252796.

Miller, Errol. “The Rise of Matriarchy in the Caribbean.” Caribbean Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3/4, 1988, pp. 1–21.

Morgan, Jennifer L. Laboring Women: Reproduction and Gender in New World Slavery. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.

Morgan, Jennifer L. “Partus Sequitur Ventrem: Law, Race, and Reproduction in Colonial Slavery.” Small Axe, vol. 22, no. 1 (55), 2018, pp. 1–17.

Morgan, Jennifer L. “Reproducing Slavery: Thinking about Women in Slavery.” Common-place, vol. 6, no. 2, Jan. 2006, commonplace.online/article/reproducing-slavery⁠.

Newman, Brooke N. A Dark Inheritance: Blood, Race, and Sex in Colonial Jamaica. Yale University Press, 2018.

Owens, Deirdre Cooper. Medical Bondage: Race, Gender, and the Origins of American Gynecology. University of Georgia Press, 2017.

Quadagno, Jill. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. Oxford University Press, 1994.

Reeves, Richard V., and Christopher Pulliam. “Why Are Employment Rates So Low Among Black Men?” Brookings Institution, 1 Mar. 2021, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-are-employment-rates-so-low-among-black-men/.

Smith, Raymond T. “Culture and Social Structure in the Caribbean: Some Recent Work on Family and Kinship Studies (Review Article).” Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 6, no. 1, 1963, pp. 24–46. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/177885.

Smith, Raymond T. “The Matrifocal Family.” The Character of Kinship, edited by Jack Goody, Cambridge University Press, 1973, pp. 121–144.

Stevens, Kara. “The Cost of the Soft Life: Why Rest Feels Risky for Black Women.” Essence, 15 Aug. 2025, https://www.essence.com/news/money-career/soft-life-cost-black-women/. 

Wade, Peter. Race and Ethnicity in Latin America. 2nd ed., Pluto Press, 2010.

Woodard, Jennifer Bailey, and Teresa Mastin. “Black Womanhood: ‘Essence’ and Its Treatment of Stereotypical Images of Black Women.” Journal of Black Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, 2005, pp. 264–281. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40034332.